It was under the leadership of Ban Ki-moon, the former Director-General, that the United Nations adopted a comprehensive programme of sustainable development goals, or SDGs as they are sometimes called. They built upon a previous framework for sustainable development entitled 'The Future We Want' which was a non-binding commitment that was the product of the UN's Rio Conference in 2012. Some in the UN, including Ki-moon, saw that this was not enough and continued to press the matter.
In 2015, the UN General Assembly adopted a paper entitled, 'Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development'. This document included a number of sections, one of which focussed on sustainable development goals. There were 17 of these in total which were adopted by the UN when the paper was published. The goals are split up further by a number of associated targets. If each of the relevant targets is hit, so the connected goal or goals should be achieved. At the time, Ki-moon said that the sustainable development goals he wanted the world to adopt would help to ensure not only its viability but also its long-term survival. “We do not have a plan B because there is no planet B,” he memorably quipped.
“Taking urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts by regulating emissions and promoting developments in renewable energy.”Likewise, the SDG of zero hunger is set to be achieved by improving food security measures and by promoting a more sustainable form of agriculture.
Although some critics have pointed out that some of the sustainable development goals might impinge upon one another – for example, improved infrastructure projects might make life on land less sustainable – the key to the approach taken by the UN is the international way in which sustainable development must be undertaken in the future. After all, the entire global population's well-being, happiness and even its survival may require greater cooperation among the people of the world to ensure the planet is fit to live on for centuries to come. Essentially, the SDGs try to offer a blueprint as to how all countries should regulate their citizens and organisations in order to do the best by the planet and its people.
Furthermore, a national plan of action must be developed with establishes targets against any budgetary considerations. Part of the 17th SDG is to promote international action and this can be seen in the way that richer countries are encouraged to seek out partners. This is because it was thought from the outset that poorer countries would need the support of more affluent nations in order meet all of their commitments under the programme.
It is fair to say that not all of the burden of meeting sustainable development goals comes down to the actions of individual governments. The Council of the Baltic Sea States decided to make their plans in cooperation with one another and published their proposed actions in a document known as the Baltic 2030 Action Plan, for instance.
In India, a policy think tank, known as the National Institution for Transforming India, was charged with coming up with many of the proposals that would see the country meet its ongoing SDG commitments. However, individual states within India have already begun implementing their own proposals in a way that is relevant to their particular circumstances and needs. As such, implementation of sustainable development goals is very varied, operating at both the sub and supranational state levels.
As you might expect, these countries and others like them, such as Spain, Japan and Denmark, were all categorised as 70 or above. When they measured their performance across all 17 goals - some which they might have been meeting due to EU policy directives anyway, thereby giving them a head start over other countries - European countries did especially well. Sweden was found to be the best performing nation with an index of 84.5 overall. Canada was the top country outside of the EU, in 13th place with an index of 76.8.
Equally unsurprisingly, the war-torn Central African Republic and troubled Liberia were at the bottom of the WEF's list of achievers with SDGs. In fact, with the exception of Haiti and Afghanistan, they found that nearly all of the lowest achieving countries were in Africa. As such, the WEF has called for international mechanisms to come into effect that will assist those at the bottom of the pile to meet their commitments by the programme's deadline of 2030. That organisation suggested direct foreign investment, technology sharing and a tranche of global tax reform measures as ways forward.
Among the key players in any UN-sponsored global programme is inevitably the United States. According to the UN's own information, the US has taken a large number of steps toward fulfilling its commitments, not least with a statewide sustainability programme for the whole of Hawaii. In addition, US schemes like the Bridge Initiative have sought to improve social and economic development across several sub-Saharan countries. Despite these measures – and more – the US still ranks as only a middling performer among countries, according to the WEF. At the UN, it is hoped that one of its major partners in many areas of international cooperation will see a dramatic improvement when it comes to SDGs prior to the 2030 deadline which moves ever closer.
Ed Gould is a UK-based journalist and freelance writer. He is a practitioner of Reiki.
Happiness, hope and positive news may seem to have been in short supply during the month of July, when so many negative news items were presented. In
Mooji is a renowned spiritual teacher who is of the Advaita non-duality tradition. Here, he offers two simple yet potent exercises about self-inquiry
Positive news and happiness are so often missing from the mainstream news agendum and May is certainly no different from any other month. However,